Stumble This | You should also watch “Pilot Suspended For Being on Terrorist Watch List” |
One CNN reporter suddenly found himself on the terror watch list after beginning a set of critical reports on the TSA. Over a million individuals are now on the list. Individuals on the list are waylaid at airports, and must get special checks just to get their tickets.
Sorry sifty, you won't be able to visit your brothers Dino or Otto this summer.
Yeah. What liberal media bias?
Remember, Democrats want the same Big Government efficiency witnessed in this sift applied to health care. What could possiBLIE go wrong?
00:55 "Make sure you get the Obama '08 sticker and anti-W stickers in focus."
Yeah. What liberal media bias?
How is this evidence of liberal media bias in any way? Even if it was a conscious choice to get this guy's political stickers in the shot, it doesn't reflect on the reporter. The guy being interviewed was ASG under Clinton and works with the ACLU, so it shouldn't be a shock that he supports Obama or dislikes Bush. In fact, it was the provision of that information that allowed you to dismiss the man's complaint as some soft, liberal whiner. The story was never about the reporter's political views, you just wanted it to be.
00:55 "Make sure you get the Obama '08 sticker and anti-W stickers in focus."
Yeah. What liberal media bias?
If you ever wonder why no one takes you seriously, it's this. This is why.
Never ever report on someone's political leaning unless they're a Republican, else you are a liberal media!
You got a 'P' next to your handle. I was annoying libs 'round here when you were in your crib shitting yellow mustard.
Raz me over pointing out a rather blatant "subliminal" sticker, which could just as easily have been out of the shot? Go back and count the number of anti-Fox sifts--no matter the content--and tell me with a straight face how I'm being nitpicky. HA.
ACLU? With its anti-religion agenda based on a fraudulent interpretation of the 1st Amendment, it's been making many people's lives miserable over nothing for decades. What do I care that this doof has been inconvenienced by the Big Government he craves? So has the "reporter"! Imagine a reporter with terminal cancer reporting on terminal cancer victims.
BTW, the misleading title of this sift makes one believe the TSA deliberately singled out the CNN reporter because he described them in an unflattering light, yet he has NO evidence, only an implication, kind of like "Bush lied." No evidence of a crime, therefore no impeachment.
Since over one milion people are also on the list "by accident", we can conclude they're all liberals working for the ACLU and/or CNN.
Glad Bush is working out for you though. Whenever I read your comments here, I think of 1984 (the movie) and the chubby guy - "I hear chocolate rations are going up from 20-25 grams. Double plus good eh?"
BTW, last time I phoned with my friend in the US, we talked about weapons he wants to buy and already owns (legally). 5 mins into the conversation I suddenly hear a high pitched noise and some other weird noises.
I wonder if me and him are now on that list too...
If you ever wonder why no one takes you seriously, it's this. This is why.
You got a 'P' next to your handle. I was annoying libs 'round here when you were in your crib shitting yellow mustard.
Raz me over pointing out a rather blatant "subliminal" sticker, which could just as easily have been out of the shot? Go back and count the number of anti-Fox sifts--no matter the content--and tell me with a straight face how I'm being nitpicky. HA.
ACLU? With its anti-religion agenda based on a fraudulent interpretation of the 1st Amendment, it's been making many people's lives miserable over nothing for decades. What do I care that this doof has been inconvenienced by the Big Government he craves? So has the "reporter"! Imagine a reporter with terminal cancer reporting on terminal cancer victims.
BTW, the misleading title of this sift makes one believe the TSA deliberately singled out the CNN reporter because he described them in an unflattering light, yet he has NO evidence, only an implication, kind of like "Bush lied." No evidence of a crime, therefore no impeachment.
Since over one milion people are also on the list "by accident", we can conclude they're all liberals working for the ACLU and/or CNN.
Wow! QM, I'm impressed. Reading that, you actually sounded reasonable and unprovocative. I think that's the first time I've actually seen some logic showing through in your arguments. Not that it hasn't been there all along, just nice to see it. Cheers! (no snark intended)